top of page

Student Group

Public·89 members

The Language Of Fashion

Roland Barthes (1915-1980), a French critic and intellectual, was a seminal figure in late twentieth-century literary criticism. Barthes's primary theory is that language is not simply words, but a series of indicators of a given society's assumptions. He derived his critical method from structuralism, which studies the rules behind language, and semiotics, which analyzes culture through signs and holds that meaning results from social conventions. Barthes believed that such techniques permit the reader to participate in the work of art under study, rather than merely react to it. Barthes's first books, Writing Degree Zero (1953), and Mythologies (1957), introduced his ideas to a European audience. During the 1960s his work began to appear in the United States in translation and became a strong influence on a generation of American literary critics and theorists. Other important works by Barthes are Elements of Semiology (1968), Critical Essays (1972), The Pleasure of the Text (1973), and The Empire of Signs (1982). The Barthes Reader (1983), edited by Susan Sontag, contains a wide selection of the critic's work in English translation.

The Language of Fashion

Language is the basis of human connection. It is believed that our human ancestors began using a language of sorts about two million years ago, and doing so gave them a distinct survival advantage. Now, language is a cornerstone of our society; we would not be able to exist without it.

Fashion, like language, is something we all must partake in. We must dress ourselves and we must speak every day, and our experiences and cultural norms highly inform both. Even if people believe the clothes they wear are chosen at random, there is most likely an unconscious reason behind why they made the choice to wear them, and such choices consistently affect the ways in which others see us.

Touching on these conversations in a fine art context is Brooklyn based artist Rose Nestler. Her fibrous works utilize designs and concepts found in fashion, yet she approaches her practice as a traditional sculptor, contextualizing her pieces in dialogue with one another, sometimes paired with performative video works that expand on themes in her work. She plays with scale and materiality to comment on functionality and aesthetics. Her more dominant works, sometimes multiple feet tall, are contrasted with softer, more gentle fabrics and colors.

In an age of fleeting trends, the fashion style of these indigenous women serves as an extension of their rich history and culture. The preservation of unique cultural traits proves to be increasingly difficult and the people who are conscious of this hard task have to constantly judge as to whether new ideas add or subtract from their beliefs.

Miuccia Prada once said, "Fashion is an instant language." I believe that fashion is a universal language with numerous dialects. In order to fully grasp this language, we must be willing to appreciate both the slight and vast variances by attempting to learn them. In a similar manner, we have learned that just as each community has its own pattern, the traditions and experiences have been etched differently in the five communities we work with: Santa Cruz, Jaibailito, Chaquichoy, Chuitzanchaj and Pajomel.

Even though all these brands are pronounced the same way everywhere in the world, there are still so many fashion-related terms that are not always as easy to translate. In order to make sure that language barriers never get in the way of your retail business achieving international success, contact K International today.

I am celebrating big happy news with you all today as I have found all of the translations of my fashion design book online last week and want to show you the different covers and share them with you!

Half written while nursing my little Angelina, ( 6 1/2 years old at the time of this article) and before launching my own business (Fashion Illustration Tribe online fashion program) it was truly an epic journey in so many ways that I am still just beginning to talk about with you all.

The theory of linguistic relativity suggests that language shapes thought: that words influence how we perceive and imagine the world. It goes some way to explain how, for example, the Inuit, who with their many words for snow, perceive variations and possibilities in snow types that speakers of other tongues have never considered.

A really interesting post and I do think that some of the issues with sustainability in fashion and its acceptance are also to do with the language that is used. I look forward to exploring the Local Wisdom site further.

This theory course is dedicated to those who are interested in the world of fashion as a hobby or for professional reasons. As in all thematic courses, this one aims not only at providing knowledge of the language of fashion, but also at improving the student's general knowledge of the Italian language on the basis of the didactic principle that the things that interest us are much more easily assimilated.

The program focuses on the language of this important sector of the Italian economy and culutre, aiming at providing students with the basic vocabulary and technical expressions that are most often used. After identifying the basic technical vocabulary and expressions, the student is helped to assimilate them through targeted exercises and discussions. On the request of the student, guided visits can be arranged to shops, fashion producers, fashion museums and designer studios.

As a language clothing can range from conventional to eccentric styles. Dress can identify its wearer with a social group or role that the individual wants to emulate. Notice how significant jeans are to teenagers. Importance is placed upon style, cost and labels that identify them as designer. As a nonverbal language, the jeans may signal that they are all members of the same group, no matter how different they may be socially or intellectually. Teenage girls carry the group identification a step further by sharing clothes. In this way they share their friendship and group identity, just as they share their slang in creating their own verbal language.1But clothing can and does express more than identity with a group or role. It can also express the value of that group.

With his friend Lucinda Chambers in the audience, Russell Marsh spoke of his extensive experience as a Casting Director in the fashion industry and how important it is to find your voice. With an extensive career spanning over 20 years, Marsh is known for his long-standing work at Prada and for discovering models such as Lara Stone and Gemma Ward. A hugely entertaining and animated speaker, Marsh even took the time to pose for pictures with Lucinda and some of the students after his lecture.

As part of his edgy 1960s cultural criticism, French sociologist Barthes wrote extensively on fashion, culminating in The Fashion System. British academics Stafford and Michael Carter have assembled a smattering of the early interdisciplinary essays that haven't been translated before, originally published in publications as diverse as Revue Française de Sociologie and Marie Claire. The essays reveal the chronological development of Barthes's thinking, from 1957 to 1969, which essentially aimed to apply Saussure's semiology to clothing forms to show how "the signifying function of dress makes it a total social object." In the early "History and Sociology of Clothing," for example, Barthes equates the Saussurian linguistics distinctions "langue" and "parole" to fashion; that is, "langue" is dress, while "parole" is the act of getting dressed. "Language and Clothing" delves into fashion history, extracting the nugget that men's current anti-dandyist style derives from the austerity of Quaker dress. "From Gemstones to Jewellery" is one of the few essays for lay readers, as is a consideration of classic versus modern style entitled "The Contest Between Chanel and Courrèges." There's a lot of padding and explication in this slender volume, necessary to navigate Barthes's fairly difficult system. (Apr. 5)

If you want to have a language, you need to have signs, or symbols if you wish. That is things that stand for other things. Like a word stands for a thing, for an idea, and so on. But, of course, that's not enough because you have a lot of signs which are not linguistic at all. For example, smoke may be taken the sign of there is fire. Of course, smoke is not a language per se. Another thing you might want to have is this idea of communication. It's not just that the sign indicate something. It's that to the sign is used indicate that thing. Again, that's not enough at all.Because for example, I can paint my face with blood to express anger. That's a sign, that I use to communicate something, but of course, that's not a language at all. So, obviously you need more than that to pinpoint what is specific to languages in general. That will have to do is some sort of systematicity, a famous idea by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand De Saussure, that a language is a system of relations and oppositions. If you take the word "mutton" and "sheep" in English, then there are two different ways to name the same animal, but "sheep" is the animal as a living species, and "mutton" is the animal as meat.

The meaning of "mutton" is partly characterized by the fact that it is to be distinguished from the meaning of "sheep" for example. But the distinctive of a language, it's not just that you use signs, but that you use them in a certain way, and that you have the ability to combine them. Signs may be combined in a productive manner. That idea was expressed, for example, in a famous phrase by the German linguist Wilhelm von Humboldt, in the 19th century, who said that languages were the infinite use of finite means. What did Humboldt mean by that? He meant that, when you speak a language, you have the ability to produce an infinite amount of sentences. you can say that "you know that today is going to be a hard day for France", for example. But you can also say that "I know that you know that today is going to a hard day for France". or that "you know that I know that you know that today is going to be a hard day for France", and so on. Essentially, you have the ability to produce an infinite number of sentences, which means that when we learn a language, we don't just learn to match a given situation with a given sentence, but we learn something much more general, which is an ability to produce sentences in potentially infinite number of sentences. 041b061a72


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...


Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
bottom of page